Begin with a decision, not a dashboard tour

Use Bing Search Performance to answer a concrete editorial question. Which existing article deserves a clearer answer? Which useful page is receiving visibility but attracting little engagement? Which query suggests an unmet reader need? Choose one question before exporting data. The report contains query and page information, but numbers alone do not choose a content strategy. Record the selected time range and filters with your observations so the next person can reproduce them. A screenshot without its scope can encourage confident comparisons between periods or surfaces that are not actually equivalent.

Review pages alongside their queries

Look at an article and the searches associated with it together. A page can receive attention for a term that only loosely matches its purpose. Before changing its title, read the article as someone arriving with that query. Does the introduction address the task? Is the answer buried below a product pitch? Would a separate page serve the intent better? Avoid chasing every visible phrase by appending unrelated sections. The goal is to improve a resource for a coherent audience, not to turn its headings into a list of whichever words appeared in an export.

Separate opportunity from noise

Small counts can swing sharply after a few additional events. Compare meaningful periods and note launch dates, holidays, migrations, or campaign activity that could affect the pattern. Keep raw counts beside percentage changes so a large percentage is not mistaken for a large business opportunity. Segment branded and non-branded queries when that distinction helps the decision. If a report appears empty, verify the property and reporting availability before concluding the site has disappeared. Search data is evidence about observed activity; it should be interpreted together with technical checks and the site's actual publication history.

A hypothetical article improvement

Imagine a fictional accounting app sees a troubleshooting guide appear for queries about importing bank transactions. The guide currently begins with a long explanation of the product's mission before describing supported file formats. An editor moves the concrete compatibility answer near the top and adds a clearly labeled example file. The team logs the change and compares subsequent observations with an appropriate earlier period. This example proposes a sensible intervention; it does not invent a lift in clicks or claim the wording caused any later movement without further evidence.

Create a short action register

For each selected opportunity, record the page, query group, reader problem, proposed edit, owner, publication date, and review date. Limit the number of simultaneous changes so the team can explain what it did. Pair traffic observations with business outcomes from your own analytics where available, keeping attribution limitations visible. A page that attracts fewer but more qualified visitors may still be valuable. The weekly output should be a small set of editorial decisions with supporting evidence, not a longer spreadsheet every week. That makes the reporting process useful even when the site's total traffic is still modest.

PUT IT TO WORK

Use page-and-query evidence to choose a specific reader improvement, then record the change before evaluating its effect.

Sources & further reading

Official documentation informs this guide. Examples are illustrative, and product interfaces or limits can change.

THE WORKSPACE WE'RE BUILDING

From search signals to a useful first draft.

SERP.so is in development. Join the waitlist for a workspace that connects research, content review, and publishing.

Join early access ↗